Castle Age Forums  

Go Back   Castle Age Forums > Castle Age > Game Help & Strategies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:36 PM
Lenny1000
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stamina/Attack Balance

This may have already been covered but i can't find it anywhere. When you level you either can spend your skill points on stamina or attack (i'm trying to improve the quantity of damage i do to cronus) What is the best balance to have in terms of attack vs stamina. Do you need more stamina so you can hit it more or more attack so you cause more damage per hit
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:48 PM
Punkle's Avatar
Punkle Punkle is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: he sells sanctuary...
Posts: 3,179
Default

Attack.

Why? look here: http://www.castleageforums.com/cforu...4&postcount=45
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:53 PM
Zolrak Zolrak is offline
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 44
Default

But also consider that for every attack you win more experience points, so having more stamina will give you more (even if it's little) experience.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:27 PM
Falco's Avatar
Falco Falco is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 704
Default

However, also consider that stamina takes time to fill. If you have too much stamina, you're going to be sitting there empty a lot of the time unless you have so much stamina that you keep leveling very quickly. So, you either want just barely enough stamina so you don't lose any and put everything else into attack or 100% stamina and 0 attack and defense so you can level very quickly and take advantage of the refills.

In this case, I believe the balance is at the extremes, not in the middle.

Edit: Oh, come ON. "LOTF with 200 stamina & 67 att" vs "Me with 65 stamina and 740 att" is such an utterly unfair comparison! 200 sta + 67 att = 467 stat points while 65 sta + 740 att = 870 stat points.

Edit 2: Doing the math, for it to be a fair comparison, LOTF would have to have 401 stamina, which would result in 312000 dmg, assuming no refills. If we add in refills, LOTF seems likely to pull ahead due to increased experience.

Last edited by Falco; 11-17-2009 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:54 PM
Jaraxxis's Avatar
Jaraxxis Jaraxxis is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco View Post
However, also consider that stamina takes time to fill. If you have too much stamina, you're going to be sitting there empty a lot of the time unless you have so much stamina that you keep leveling very quickly. So, you either want just barely enough stamina so you don't lose any and put everything else into attack or 100% stamina and 0 attack and defense so you can level very quickly and take advantage of the refills.

In this case, I believe the balance is at the extremes, not in the middle.

Edit: Oh, come ON. "LOTF with 200 stamina & 67 att" vs "Me with 65 stamina and 740 att" is such an utterly unfair comparison! 200 sta + 67 att = 467 stat points while 65 sta + 740 att = 870 stat points.

Edit 2: Doing the math, for it to be a fair comparison, LOTF would have to have 401 stamina, which would result in 312000 dmg, assuming no refills. If we add in refills, LOTF seems likely to pull ahead due to increased experience.
@Falco:
Later on someone posted that even if LOTF had skill points = to Gkika that yes it would double the Initial burst dmg. However since hydra experience gives less returns than a dragon = less leveling. So without the leveling bursts are not had and normal regen attacks will leave the one with higher attack in the lead.

@Lenny
In short the balance you want to keep depends on your style of play. If you want dramatically increase your damage on hydras then spill it all on attack.

If you want to keep on tacking on the the levels the spill it all on stamina. However dragons are better leveling machines than hydras. So you have to ask yourself what is your goal? Help friends with hydra/get hydra drops/ or level.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2009, 11:07 PM
Falco's Avatar
Falco Falco is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 704
Default

Without leveling, it's still 312000 dmg for LOTR and 315900 dmg for Glika. That's just 1.25% difference. Glika is only just barely in the lead per clip. If you add it up across a long enough period of time, the high-stamina person would level and make up for it. Over time, if both people start off with the same number of stat points, the high-stamina person will get more stat points faster than the high-attack person as well.

Overall, they're rather equivalent. Attack isn't a clear winner at all, as Punkle and Punkle's link seemed to be suggesting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2009, 05:51 AM
Sophia Dragonhunter's Avatar
Sophia Dragonhunter Sophia Dragonhunter is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,950
Default

Cronus' experience return is too low to consider full stamina. If you want to be the best Cronus hunter there is, you should put just enough points in stamina to not waste any while you sleep (96 if you sleep 8 hours, 108 if you sleep 9 hours, 120 if you sleep 10 hours or want it to regenerate at the same rate as your energy). I suggest 120 stamina/energy and everything else into attack.
__________________
The Dueler Strategy Guide | The Invader Strategy Guide
"Sophia Dragonhunter {ℜ}", level 321 Baroness
130 Energy, 971 Stamina, 400 Attack, 26 Defense, 100 Health
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:24 AM
apion007 apion007 is offline
Castle Age Scribe
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lena Gkika View Post
You know that is a very interesting case here.

LOTF with 200 stamina & 67 att can do on average (200/5)*3900=156000 dmg in one round of power attacks

Me with 65 stamina and 740 att can do on average (65/5)*24300=315900 dmg in one round of power attacks.

Per 24h, if no refills are done, LOTF can do 156000*288/200=224640 dmg
Per 24h i can do 315900*288/65=1399680 dmg

that is about 6.2 times more than LOTF.

Which proves that huge stamina does not make up for a good att stat
I'm not getting this, where's the logic?

67 attk + 200 stamina = 67 + (200 x 2) = 467 stat points

65 stamina + 740 attk = (65 x 2) + 740 = 870 stat points

I don't think this is a suitable comparison which it doesn't compare apple to apple.


Let's see the real situation between 2 players:
[SIZE="3"]
Player A : Aim for high attk, low stamina (50-70 stamina)
[/SIZE]
2 weeks --> lvl 50, Stamina 50, attk 150
3 weeks --> lvl 60, Stamina 60, attk 190
4 weeks --> lvl 70, Stamina 70, attk 230
5 weeks --> lvl 75, Stamina 70, attk 255
6 weeks --> lvl 80, Stamina 70, attk 280
7 weeks --> lvl 85, Stamina 70, attk 290
Player A end up with high battle won in duel, and kill a lot ppl
My friend ended up pumping a lot in stamina after 2 months, due to no stamina too boring to play.



[SIZE="3"]
Player B : Aim for low attk, high stamina (100 - 150 stamina)[/SIZE]

2 weeks --> lvl 50, Stamina 80, attk 90
3 weeks --> lvl 70, Stamina 100, attk 140
4 weeks --> lvl 85, Stamina 120, attk 175
5 weeks --> lvl 100, Stamina 130, attk 230
6 weeks --> lvl 110, Stamina 140, attk 260
7 weeks --> lvl 120, Stamina 150, attk 290
Player B end up with high lvl, and a lot of hydra head (can tag 3 hydra at a time).
My friend ended up with 40+ hydra head within 1 week.



[SIZE="3"]So guys, choose what path you need to take to achieve your goal. Easily you can see what will become after 6 months of playing, the choice is yours.[/SIZE]

[SIZE="3"]P.S: If want to enjoy the game, enjoy it to the max, soon, next year Diablo 3 or Star Craft 2 coming out, most of you probably will spend less time on CA :-P[/SIZE]

Last edited by apion007; 11-18-2009 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2009, 08:47 AM
wuct85 wuct85 is offline
Adventurer
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 19
Default

apion007, add me when d3 comes out, we mf together~
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2009, 08:52 AM
Jaraxxis's Avatar
Jaraxxis Jaraxxis is offline
Castle Age Royalty
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco View Post
Without leveling, it's still 312000 dmg for LOTR and 315900 dmg for Glika. That's just 1.25% difference. Glika is only just barely in the lead per clip. If you add it up across a long enough period of time, the high-stamina person would level and make up for it. Over time, if both people start off with the same number of stat points, the high-stamina person will get more stat points faster than the high-attack person as well.

Overall, they're rather equivalent. Attack isn't a clear winner at all, as Punkle and Punkle's link seemed to be suggesting.
Yes they are near same for burst dmg but during normal regen periods when waiting for a level the attack player is going to deal way more damage
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.