Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Cost benefit analysis

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    A Small Red Dot in the Ocean
    Posts
    5,109

    Default Cost benefit analysis

    Just curious, has anyone done a cost benefit analysis of the SP available in the conquest shop?

    For example

    XX Gear cost 1000 GC and provides 7 SP in IA
    10 SP cost 1000 GC

    therefore the ranking is

    100GC/SP for the 10 SP option
    142GC/SP for the xx gear option

    Hopefully I don't need to reinvent the wheel here

  2. #2

    Default

    100 gc/sp sounds about right.....atleast what i follow...
    Equipment is irrelevant...you buy it every time because you also get the set bonus...


    What the cost benefit should be is off whether the sp gained through fortification path is worth the energy...as you could spend the energy on runes or quests...but that is just me..ignore this i don't want to derail the thread

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    6,373

    Default

    Something like this?

    Except that's only for SP, doesn't include equipment or anything else. And doesn't include all SP, some Engineering still missing.
    WARNING: THE POST ABOVE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN SARCASM AND/OR IRONY!

    Elandal [FIN] ΛĢ 8218DD

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    A Small Red Dot in the Ocean
    Posts
    5,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elandal View Post
    Something like this?

    Except that's only for SP, doesn't include equipment or anything else. And doesn't include all SP, some Engineering still missing.
    I checked through the spreadsheet, I think I prefer to use the list from the wiki instead

    One thing I need to verify is: is the list of SP, requirements and cost duplicated across all the 4 paths? Basically if 1 path has say 10sp costing 1000GC needing 10 mirthils to unlock, all the other paths should have the same

    Just to be doubly sure, can someone(s) who has completed all the paths verify if SP is present in all the below positions?

    1
    9
    10
    16
    17
    23
    25
    29
    32
    33
    35
    39
    62
    63
    68
    69
    74
    75
    80
    81
    90
    91
    92
    93
    94
    95
    96
    97
    98
    99
    100
    101
    102
    103

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    A Small Red Dot in the Ocean
    Posts
    5,109

    Default

    Did my own sheet based on what I have and what I know

    Basically its a known fact that Position 39 and above SP is the most value for coin, but after that things get iffy

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
    Last edited by AyameNoop; 11-14-2017 at 02:30 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    6,373

    Default

    Engineering has some differences at least in early parts, other three paths are identical.
    Had all paths in my spreadsheet because it's just a quick extract from my personal spreadsheet where I've marked acquired / unlocked / locked and thus usually just want to see what's the next best unlocked pack.

    For Conqueror, Guardian, and Hunter paths your spreadsheet should be correct.
    WARNING: THE POST ABOVE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN SARCASM AND/OR IRONY!

    Elandal [FIN] ΛĢ 8218DD

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    A Small Red Dot in the Ocean
    Posts
    5,109

    Default

    if only there was someone who had finished Engineering path to audit the spreadsheet...........

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •