PDA

View Full Version : CA's picks for War Council



stuey5071
06-24-2010, 12:55 AM
I've noticed that whenever my War Council is reset by CA, Kataan (22/22) is never included in the lineup, even though Calista (21/19) and Kaylen (19/21), while having slightly weaker stats, are still recruited.

Not a problem, since I always rearrange my Council anyway, but I was just curious to know why CA would leave my hunter off the list. Anyone have any suggestions?

Cheers!

Azraelswrd
06-24-2010, 01:07 AM
One theory is that the game look at general's level 1 stats when choosing the default WC. Yeah, I hate that too and have to re-add Kataan.

Anomiska
06-24-2010, 02:42 AM
So whenever you assign a war council then it distributes the equip to each general. I want to confirm a couple of things:

1. It does not seem to update if i got new loot which should replace some of the items.
2. Is it a different set for attack and defense or the same?

Azraelswrd
06-24-2010, 02:45 AM
1) It didn't for me. I had to reselect my WC to make sure the newer better gear was equipped.

2) Unknown.

Anomiska
06-24-2010, 02:50 AM
1) Yea I also attacked and saw there wasn't an update. Reassignment did the trick.

Since dueling picks different offense/defense sets, I would think War also assigns two sets. But the fact that it has a static assignment whenever you set your council makes me think it might not be true .. maybe someone can get attacked and tell us :/

Vinnie Rader
06-24-2010, 03:07 AM
You have to look at your level 1 stats and do the att + .7 Def math and then Kaylen is better than Kataan.

Adjusted attack:

Kaylen 16 18 28.6
Adrianna 16 18 28.6
Kaiser 17 16 28.2
Barbarous 18 14 27.8
Minerva 17 15 27.5
Fenris/Darius16 16 27.2
Kataan 16 16 27.2


Does that make the CA picks seem more reasonable?

Vinnie Rader
06-24-2010, 03:09 AM
You have to look at your level 1 stats and do the att + .7 Def math and then Kaylen is better than Kataan.

Adjusted attack:

Kaylen 16 18 28.6
Adrianna 16 18 28.6
Kaiser 17 16 28.2
Barbarous 18 14 27.8
Minerva 17 15 27.5
Fenris/Darius16 16 27.2
Kataan 16 16 27.2


Does that make the CA picks seem more reasonable?

I didn't add Scarlett she is 17/17 adj att = 28.9, the best of the FP generals.

stuey5071
06-24-2010, 04:33 AM
Yup, that certainly makes alot of sense. I suppose it's much simpler for CA to just work on Level 1 stats rather than having to determine what level each general is at for every single player.

Thanks for clearing that up!

icollyer
06-24-2010, 05:50 AM
One theory is that the game look at general's level 1 stats when choosing the default WC. Yeah, I hate that too and have to re-add Kataan.

I'd still re-arrange my generals even if CA did correctly choose them by level 4 stats.

CA assigns your generals from left to right, strongest to weakest, I want my strongest generals guarding those 3-point positions.